Articles
A
Commentary: "Water or Wine?"
By Chris Poehlmann
Published in the Independent Observer October, 2002
It's
official. It is open season on the north coast forests. The
California Department of Forestry (CDF) has just approved two
of the many pending forestland to vineyard conversions in the
Annapolis area. Clear cutting is presently taking place on many
acres of conversions spearheaded by vineyard entrepreneurs.
They hope to profit by permanently scraping an ancient forest
ecosystem off coastal hills and planting the bare ground with
wine grapes. The CDF approvals of the "Putnam" and
"Jones" conversions in Annapolis represent the opening
door on a far reaching, serious threat to maintaining water
quality, water quantity and biodiversity in north coast watersheds.
The
deforestation in these plans being approved and those pending
is being done without any thorough study of the cumulative effects
from all of the existing, pending, and potential future conversions.
These planned coastal vineyards are in water scarce areas and
utilize large lined reservoirs that prevent natural runoff from
entering streams and the river. Evidence is mounting that a
neighboring river to the north, the Navarro, is experiencing
greatly reduced summer flow due to the extensive vineyard development
in Anderson Valley.
The
complex forest ecosystem acts as a sponge that absorbs winter
rainfall and releases it slowly over the year to maintain fish,
riparian habitat and clean safe water for users such as The
Sea Ranch and the town of Gualala. It would seem prudent for
these two water companies to be concerned enough about future
water availability to join in a call to study this new threat.
If conversions continue they might "solve" one of
the other threats to the Gualala River watershed: the proposed
water-bagging scheme will become a moot point if enough water
does not reach the estuary and the existing wells along the
river. In addition, a long list of pesticides is regularly used
in commercial vineyards. No study exists looking into the effects
of this potential chemical cocktail on salmonids and other downstream
fauna and users.
Allowing successive conversions is akin to playing Russian roulette
with the health of the watershed. Cumulative impacts must be
thoroughly considered in any approval process. Data is needed
now to quantify the amount of potential acreage that is at risk.
This would involve looking at the soil types, microclimate and
other factors that are attracting vineyard speculators to the
precious, remaining coastal forests.
Concern
about these conversions and/or calls for a moratorium and study
should be directed to:
Andrea Tuttle
Director California Department of Forestry and Fire Services
1416 Ninth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Letters
should also be cc'd to the Sonoma County Permit and Resource
Management Department which is updating the General Plan with
its control of permitted land uses through zoning.
SCPRMD
2550 Ventura Avenue
Santa Rosa, CA 95403-2829
Chris Poehlmann
Annapolis